Source: FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 30 (3):453-458, MAR 2016
Brief summary of the paper: Will climate change threaten wildlife populations by gradual shifts in mean conditions, or by increased frequency of extreme weather events?
Based on long-term data (from 1991 to 2014), the aim of the present study was to analyse and compare the sensitivity of predator–prey demography to extreme climatic events versus normal, albeit highly variable, annual deviations in climatic conditions in the Australian wet–dry tropics.
From 1991 to 2005, predators (water pythons, Liasis fuscus) and their main prey (dusky rats,Rattus colletti) showed significant climate-driven fluctuations in numbers.
These fluctuations were, however, trivial compared to the impact of two massive but brief deluges in 2007 and 2011, which virtually eliminated the dusky rats. The two floods resulted in the pythons experiencing an unprecedented famine in seven out of the last 8 years causing a massive shift in python demography, that is a significant reduction in feeding rates, reproductive output, growth rates, relative body mass, survival, mean body length and numbers (from 3173 in 1992 to 96 in 2013).
Our results demonstrate that attempts to predict faunal responses to climate change, even if based on long-term studies, may be doomed to failure. Consequently, biologists may need to confront the uncomfortable truth that increased frequency of brief unpredictable bouts of extreme weather can influence populations far more than gradual deviations in mean climatic conditions.